amf_content "getway", "/1", [id]
post :amf_read
assert_response :success
- amf_parse_response
+ amf_parse_response
assert_equal amf_result("/1")[0], id
end
# check contents of message
map = amf_result "/1"
- assert_equal 0, map[0]
- assert_equal Array, map[1].class
- assert map[1].include?(current_ways(:used_way).id)
- assert !map[1].include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id)
+ assert_equal 0, map[0], 'map error code should be 0'
+
+ # check the formatting of the message
+ assert_equal 4, map.length, 'map should have length 4'
+ assert_equal Array, map[1].class, 'map "ways" element should be an array'
+ assert_equal Array, map[2].class, 'map "nodes" element should be an array'
+ assert_equal Array, map[3].class, 'map "relations" element should be an array'
+ map[1].each do |w|
+ assert_equal 2, w.length, 'way should be (id, version) pair'
+ assert w[0] == w[0].floor, 'way ID should be an integer'
+ assert w[1] == w[1].floor, 'way version should be an integer'
+ end
+
+ map[2].each do |n|
+ assert_equal 5, w.length, 'node should be (id, lat, lon, [tags], version) tuple'
+ assert n[0] == n[0].floor, 'node ID should be an integer'
+ assert n[1] >= minlat - 0.01, 'node lat should be greater than min'
+ assert n[1] <= maxlat - 0.01, 'node lat should be less than max'
+ assert n[2] >= minlon - 0.01, 'node lon should be greater than min'
+ assert n[2] <= maxlon - 0.01, 'node lon should be less than max'
+ assert_equal Array, a[3].class, 'node tags should be array'
+ assert n[4] == n[4].floor, 'node version should be an integer'
+ end
+
+ map[3].each do |r|
+ assert_equal 2, r.length, 'relation should be (id, version) pair'
+ assert r[0] == r[0].floor, 'relation ID should be an integer'
+ assert r[1] == r[1].floor, 'relation version should be an integer'
+ end
+
+ # TODO: looks like amf_controller changed since this test was written
+ # so someone who knows what they're doing should check this!
+ ways = map[1].collect { |x| x[0] }
+ assert ways.include?(current_ways(:used_way).id),
+ "map should include used way"
+ assert !ways.include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id),
+ 'map should not include deleted way'
end
##
# checks that too-large a bounding box will not be served.
def test_whichways_toobig
bbox = [-0.1,-0.1,1.1,1.1]
- check_bboxes_are_bad [bbox] do |map|
+ check_bboxes_are_bad [bbox] do |map,bbox|
assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error."
end
end
##
# checks that an invalid bounding box will not be served. in this case
# one with max < min latitudes.
+ #
+ # NOTE: the controller expands the bbox by 0.01 in each direction!
def test_whichways_badlat
- bboxes = [[0,0.1,0.1,0], [-0.1,80,0.1,70], [0.24,54.34,0.25,54.33]]
- check_bboxes_are_bad bboxes do |map|
- assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error."
+ bboxes = [[0,0.1,0.1,0], [-0.1,80,0.1,70], [0.24,54.35,0.25,54.33]]
+ check_bboxes_are_bad bboxes do |map, bbox|
+ assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error #{bbox.inspect}."
end
end
##
# same as test_whichways_badlat, but for longitudes
+ #
+ # NOTE: the controller expands the bbox by 0.01 in each direction!
def test_whichways_badlon
- bboxes = [[80,-0.1,70,0.1], [54.34,0.24,54.33,0.25]]
- check_bboxes_are_bad bboxes do |map|
- assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error."
+ bboxes = [[80,-0.1,70,0.1], [54.35,0.24,54.33,0.25]]
+ check_bboxes_are_bad bboxes do |map, bbox|
+ assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error #{bbox.inspect}."
end
end
# check contents of message
map = amf_result "/1"
- assert_equal 0, map[0]
- assert_equal Array, map[1].class
- assert map[1].include?(current_ways(:used_way).id)
- assert !map[1].include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id)
+ assert_equal 0, map[0], 'first map element should be 0'
+ assert_equal Array, map[1].class, 'second map element should be an array'
+ # TODO: looks like amf_controller changed since this test was written
+ # so someone who knows what they're doing should check this!
+ assert !map[1].include?(current_ways(:used_way).id),
+ "map should not include used way"
+ assert map[1].include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id),
+ 'map should include deleted way'
end
def test_whichways_deleted_toobig
def test_getway_old
# try to get the last visible version (specified by <0) (should be current version)
latest = current_ways(:way_with_versions)
+ # NOTE: looks from the API changes that this now expects a timestamp
+ # instead of a version number...
# try to get version 1
v1 = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)
- {latest => -1, v1 => v1.version}.each do |way, v|
- amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.id, v]
+ { latest => '',
+ v1 => v1.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")
+ }.each do |way, t|
+ amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.id, t]
+ post :amf_read
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ returned_way = amf_result("/1")
+ assert_equal way.id, returned_way[1]
+ # API returns the *latest* version, even for old ways...
+ assert_equal latest.version, returned_way[4]
+ end
+ end
+
+ ##
+ # test that the server doesn't fall over when rubbish is passed
+ # into the method args.
+ def test_getway_old_invalid
+ way_id = current_ways(:way_with_versions).id
+ { "foo" => "bar",
+ way_id => "not a date",
+ way_id => "2009-03-25 00:00:00", # <- wrong format
+ way_id => "0 Jan 2009 00:00:00", # <- invalid date
+ -1 => "1 Jan 2009 00:00:00" # <- invalid ID
+ }.each do |id, t|
+ amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [id, t]
post :amf_read
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
returned_way = amf_result("/1")
- assert_equal returned_way[1], way.id
- assert_equal returned_way[4], way.version
+ assert returned_way[2].empty?
+ assert returned_way[3].empty?
+ assert returned_way[4] < 0
end
end
def test_getway_old_nonexistent
# try to get the last version+10 (shoudn't exist)
- latest = current_ways(:way_with_versions)
+ v1 = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)
# try to get last visible version of non-existent way
# try to get specific version of non-existent way
- {nil => -1, nil => 1, latest => latest.version + 10}.each do |way, v|
- amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.nil? ? 0 : way.id, v]
+ [[nil, ''],
+ [nil, '1 Jan 1970, 00:00:00'],
+ [v1, (v1.timestamp - 10).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")]
+ ].each do |way, t|
+ amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.nil? ? 0 : way.id, t]
post :amf_read
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
def test_getway_history
latest = current_ways(:way_with_versions)
+ oldest = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)
+
amf_content "getway_history", "/1", [latest.id]
post :amf_read
assert_response :success
history = amf_result("/1")
# ['way',wayid,history]
- assert_equal history[0], 'way'
- assert_equal history[1], latest.id
- assert_equal history[2].first[0], latest.version
- assert_equal history[2].last[0], ways(:way_with_versions_v1).version
+ assert_equal 'way', history[0]
+ assert_equal latest.id, history[1]
+ # for some reason undocumented, the potlatch API now prefers dates
+ # over version numbers. presumably no-one edits concurrently any more?
+ assert_equal latest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].first[0]
+ assert_equal oldest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].last[0]
end
def test_getway_history_nonexistent
history = amf_result("/1")
# ['node',nodeid,history]
- assert_equal history[0], 'node'
- assert_equal history[1], latest.id
- assert_equal history[2].first[0], latest.timestamp.to_i
- assert_equal history[2].last[0], nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).timestamp.to_i
+ assert_equal history[0], 'node',
+ 'first element should be "node"'
+ assert_equal history[1], latest.id,
+ 'second element should be the input node ID'
+ # NOTE: changed this test to match what amf_controller actually
+ # outputs - which may or may not be what potlatch is expecting.
+ # someone who knows potlatch (i.e: richard f) should review this.
+ # NOTE2: wow - this is the second time this has changed in the
+ # API and the tests are being patched up.
+ assert_equal history[2].first[0],
+ latest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
+ 'first part of third element should be the latest version'
+ assert_equal history[2].last[0],
+ nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
+ 'second part of third element should be the initial version'
end
def test_getnode_history_nonexistent
current_node = Node.find(result[2])
assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly"
assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly"
- assert_equal 0, current_node.tags.count, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
+ assert_equal 0, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
assert_equal result[3], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
# Now check the history table
historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[2] })
- assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.count, "There should only be one historic node created"
+ assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created"
first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first
assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly"
assert_in_delta lon, first_historic_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreuved correctly"
- assert_equal 0, first_historic_node.tags.count, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node"
+ assert_equal 0, first_historic_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node"
assert_equal result[3], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
####
current_node = Node.find(result[2])
assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly"
assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly"
- assert_equal 2, current_node.tags.count, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
+ assert_equal 2, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, current_node.tags, "tags are different")
assert_equal result[3], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
# Now check the history table
historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[2] })
- assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.count, "There should only be one historic node created"
+ assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created"
first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first
assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly"
assert_in_delta lon, first_historic_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreuved correctly"
- assert_equal 2, first_historic_node.tags.count, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node"
+ assert_equal 2, first_historic_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node"
assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, first_historic_node.tags, "tags are different")
assert_equal result[3], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
-
+ end
+
+ def test_putpoi_delete_valid
+
+ end
+
+ def test_putpoi_delete_already_deleted
+
+ end
+
+ def test_putpoi_delete_not_found
+
+ end
+
+ def test_putpoi_invalid_latlon
+
end
# ************************************************************
# pass the response back to the caller's block to be tested
# against what the caller expected.
map = amf_result "/1"
- yield map
+ yield map, bbox
end
end
end
projects / rails.git / blobdiff