--- /dev/null
+require 'spec/mocks/methods'
+require 'spec/mocks/argument_constraint_matchers'
+require 'spec/mocks/spec_methods'
+require 'spec/mocks/proxy'
+require 'spec/mocks/mock'
+require 'spec/mocks/argument_expectation'
+require 'spec/mocks/message_expectation'
+require 'spec/mocks/order_group'
+require 'spec/mocks/errors'
+require 'spec/mocks/error_generator'
+require 'spec/mocks/extensions/object'
+require 'spec/mocks/space'
+
+
+module Spec
+ # == Mocks and Stubs
+ #
+ # RSpec will create Mock Objects and Stubs for you at runtime, or attach stub/mock behaviour
+ # to any of your real objects (Partial Mock/Stub). Because the underlying implementation
+ # for mocks and stubs is the same, you can intermingle mock and stub
+ # behaviour in either dynamically generated mocks or your pre-existing classes.
+ # There is a semantic difference in how they are created, however,
+ # which can help clarify the role it is playing within a given spec.
+ #
+ # == Mock Objects
+ #
+ # Mocks are objects that allow you to set and verify expectations that they will
+ # receive specific messages during run time. They are very useful for specifying how the subject of
+ # the spec interacts with its collaborators. This approach is widely known as "interaction
+ # testing".
+ #
+ # Mocks are also very powerful as a design tool. As you are
+ # driving the implementation of a given class, Mocks provide an anonymous
+ # collaborator that can change in behaviour as quickly as you can write an expectation in your
+ # spec. This flexibility allows you to design the interface of a collaborator that often
+ # does not yet exist. As the shape of the class being specified becomes more clear, so do the
+ # requirements for its collaborators - often leading to the discovery of new types that are
+ # needed in your system.
+ #
+ # Read Endo-Testing[http://www.mockobjects.com/files/endotesting.pdf] for a much
+ # more in depth description of this process.
+ #
+ # == Stubs
+ #
+ # Stubs are objects that allow you to set "stub" responses to
+ # messages. As Martin Fowler points out on his site,
+ # mocks_arent_stubs[http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html].
+ # Paraphrasing Fowler's paraphrasing
+ # of Gerard Meszaros: Stubs provide canned responses to messages they might receive in a test, while
+ # mocks allow you to specify and, subsquently, verify that certain messages should be received during
+ # the execution of a test.
+ #
+ # == Partial Mocks/Stubs
+ #
+ # RSpec also supports partial mocking/stubbing, allowing you to add stub/mock behaviour
+ # to instances of your existing classes. This is generally
+ # something to be avoided, because changes to the class can have ripple effects on
+ # seemingly unrelated specs. When specs fail due to these ripple effects, the fact
+ # that some methods are being mocked can make it difficult to understand why a
+ # failure is occurring.
+ #
+ # That said, partials do allow you to expect and
+ # verify interactions with class methods such as +#find+ and +#create+
+ # on Ruby on Rails model classes.
+ #
+ # == Further Reading
+ #
+ # There are many different viewpoints about the meaning of mocks and stubs. If you are interested
+ # in learning more, here is some recommended reading:
+ #
+ # * Mock Objects: http://www.mockobjects.com/
+ # * Endo-Testing: http://www.mockobjects.com/files/endotesting.pdf
+ # * Mock Roles, Not Objects: http://www.mockobjects.com/files/mockrolesnotobjects.pdf
+ # * Test Double Patterns: http://xunitpatterns.com/Test%20Double%20Patterns.html
+ # * Mocks aren't stubs: http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html
+ #
+ # == Creating a Mock
+ #
+ # You can create a mock in any specification (or setup) using:
+ #
+ # mock(name, options={})
+ #
+ # The optional +options+ argument is a +Hash+. Currently the only supported
+ # option is +:null_object+. Setting this to true instructs the mock to ignore
+ # any messages it hasn’t been told to expect – and quietly return itself. For example:
+ #
+ # mock("person", :null_object => true)
+ #
+ # == Creating a Stub
+ #
+ # You can create a stub in any specification (or setup) using:
+ #
+ # stub(name, stub_methods_and_values_hash)
+ #
+ # For example, if you wanted to create an object that always returns
+ # "More?!?!?!" to "please_sir_may_i_have_some_more" you would do this:
+ #
+ # stub("Mr Sykes", :please_sir_may_i_have_some_more => "More?!?!?!")
+ #
+ # == Creating a Partial Mock
+ #
+ # You don't really "create" a partial mock, you simply add method stubs and/or
+ # mock expectations to existing classes and objects:
+ #
+ # Factory.should_receive(:find).with(id).and_return(value)
+ # obj.stub!(:to_i).and_return(3)
+ # etc ...
+ #
+ # == Expecting Messages
+ #
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym)
+ # my_mock.should_not_receive(:sym)
+ #
+ # == Expecting Arguments
+ #
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).with(*args)
+ # my_mock.should_not_receive(:sym).with(*args)
+ #
+ # == Argument Constraints using Expression Matchers
+ #
+ # Arguments that are passed to #with are compared with actual arguments received
+ # using == by default. In cases in which you want to specify things about the arguments
+ # rather than the arguments themselves, you can use any of the Expression Matchers.
+ # They don't all make syntactic sense (they were primarily designed for use with
+ # Spec::Expectations), but you are free to create your own custom Spec::Matchers.
+ #
+ # Spec::Mocks does provide one additional Matcher method named #ducktype.
+ #
+ # In addition, Spec::Mocks adds some keyword Symbols that you can use to
+ # specify certain kinds of arguments:
+ #
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).with(no_args())
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).with(any_args())
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).with(1, an_instance_of(Numeric), "b") #2nd argument can any type of Numeric
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).with(1, boolean(), "b") #2nd argument can true or false
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).with(1, /abc/, "b") #2nd argument can be any String matching the submitted Regexp
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).with(1, anything(), "b") #2nd argument can be anything at all
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).with(1, ducktype(:abs, :div), "b")
+ # #2nd argument can be object that responds to #abs and #div
+ #
+ # == Receive Counts
+ #
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).once
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).twice
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).exactly(n).times
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).at_least(:once)
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).at_least(:twice)
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).at_least(n).times
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).at_most(:once)
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).at_most(:twice)
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).at_most(n).times
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).any_number_of_times
+ #
+ # == Ordering
+ #
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).ordered
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:other_sym).ordered
+ # #This will fail if the messages are received out of order
+ #
+ # == Setting Reponses
+ #
+ # Whether you are setting a mock expectation or a simple stub, you can tell the
+ # object precisely how to respond:
+ #
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).and_return(value)
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).exactly(3).times.and_return(value1, value2, value3)
+ # # returns value1 the first time, value2 the second, etc
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).and_return { ... } #returns value returned by the block
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).and_raise(error)
+ # #error can be an instantiated object or a class
+ # #if it is a class, it must be instantiable with no args
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).and_throw(:sym)
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).and_yield(values,to,yield)
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym).and_yield(values,to,yield).and_yield(some,other,values,this,time)
+ # # for methods that yield to a block multiple times
+ #
+ # Any of these responses can be applied to a stub as well, but stubs do
+ # not support any qualifiers about the message received (i.e. you can't specify arguments
+ # or receive counts):
+ #
+ # my_mock.stub!(:sym).and_return(value)
+ # my_mock.stub!(:sym).and_return(value1, value2, value3)
+ # my_mock.stub!(:sym).and_raise(error)
+ # my_mock.stub!(:sym).and_throw(:sym)
+ # my_mock.stub!(:sym).and_yield(values,to,yield)
+ # my_mock.stub!(:sym).and_yield(values,to,yield).and_yield(some,other,values,this,time)
+ #
+ # == Arbitrary Handling
+ #
+ # Once in a while you'll find that the available expectations don't solve the
+ # particular problem you are trying to solve. Imagine that you expect the message
+ # to come with an Array argument that has a specific length, but you don't care
+ # what is in it. You could do this:
+ #
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:sym) do |arg|
+ # arg.should be_an_istance_of(Array)
+ # arg.length.should == 7
+ # end
+ #
+ # Note that this would fail if the number of arguments received was different from
+ # the number of block arguments (in this case 1).
+ #
+ # == Combining Expectation Details
+ #
+ # Combining the message name with specific arguments, receive counts and responses
+ # you can get quite a bit of detail in your expectations:
+ #
+ # my_mock.should_receive(:<<).with("illegal value").once.and_raise(ArgumentError)
+ module Mocks
+ end
+end