class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
api_fixtures
- # this should be what AMF controller returns when the bbox of a request
- # is invalid or too large.
- BOUNDARY_ERROR = [-2,"Sorry - I can't get the map for that area."]
+ ##
+ # test all routes which lead to this controller
+ def test_routes
+ assert_routing(
+ { :path => "/api/0.6/amf/read", :method => :post },
+ { :controller => "amf", :action => "amf_read" }
+ )
+ assert_routing(
+ { :path => "/api/0.6/amf/write", :method => :post },
+ { :controller => "amf", :action => "amf_write" }
+ )
+ end
def test_getway
# check a visible way
post :amf_read
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
- assert_equal amf_result("/1")[0], id
+ way = amf_result("/1")
+ assert_equal way[0], 0
+ assert_equal way[2], id
end
def test_getway_invisible
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
way = amf_result("/1")
- assert_equal way[0], id
- assert way[1].empty? and way[2].empty?
+ assert_equal way[0], -4
+ assert_equal way[1], "way"
+ assert_equal way[2], id
+ assert way[3].nil? and way[4].nil?
end
def test_getway_nonexistent
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
way = amf_result("/1")
- assert_equal way[0], 0
- assert way[1].empty? and way[2].empty?
+ assert_equal way[0], -4
+ assert_equal way[1], "way"
+ assert_equal way[2], 0
+ assert way[3].nil? and way[4].nil?
end
def test_whichways
# check contents of message
map = amf_result "/1"
assert_equal 0, map[0], 'map error code should be 0'
+ assert_equal "", map[1], 'map error text should be empty'
# check the formatting of the message
- assert_equal 4, map.length, 'map should have length 4'
- assert_equal Array, map[1].class, 'map "ways" element should be an array'
- assert_equal Array, map[2].class, 'map "nodes" element should be an array'
- assert_equal Array, map[3].class, 'map "relations" element should be an array'
- map[1].each do |w|
+ assert_equal 5, map.length, 'map should have length 5'
+ assert_equal Array, map[2].class, 'map "ways" element should be an array'
+ assert_equal Array, map[3].class, 'map "nodes" element should be an array'
+ assert_equal Array, map[4].class, 'map "relations" element should be an array'
+ map[2].each do |w|
assert_equal 2, w.length, 'way should be (id, version) pair'
assert w[0] == w[0].floor, 'way ID should be an integer'
assert w[1] == w[1].floor, 'way version should be an integer'
end
- map[2].each do |n|
+ map[3].each do |n|
assert_equal 5, w.length, 'node should be (id, lat, lon, [tags], version) tuple'
assert n[0] == n[0].floor, 'node ID should be an integer'
assert n[1] >= minlat - 0.01, 'node lat should be greater than min'
assert n[4] == n[4].floor, 'node version should be an integer'
end
- map[3].each do |r|
+ map[4].each do |r|
assert_equal 2, r.length, 'relation should be (id, version) pair'
assert r[0] == r[0].floor, 'relation ID should be an integer'
assert r[1] == r[1].floor, 'relation version should be an integer'
# TODO: looks like amf_controller changed since this test was written
# so someone who knows what they're doing should check this!
- ways = map[1].collect { |x| x[0] }
+ ways = map[2].collect { |x| x[0] }
assert ways.include?(current_ways(:used_way).id),
"map should include used way"
assert !ways.include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id),
def test_whichways_toobig
bbox = [-0.1,-0.1,1.1,1.1]
check_bboxes_are_bad [bbox] do |map,bbox|
- assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error."
+ assert_boundary_error map, " The server said: The maximum bbox size is 0.25, and your request was too large. Either request a smaller area, or use planet.osm"
end
end
def test_whichways_badlat
bboxes = [[0,0.1,0.1,0], [-0.1,80,0.1,70], [0.24,54.35,0.25,54.33]]
check_bboxes_are_bad bboxes do |map, bbox|
- assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error #{bbox.inspect}."
+ assert_boundary_error map, " The server said: The minimum latitude must be less than the maximum latitude, but it wasn't", bbox.inspect
end
end
def test_whichways_badlon
bboxes = [[80,-0.1,70,0.1], [54.35,0.24,54.33,0.25]]
check_bboxes_are_bad bboxes do |map, bbox|
- assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error #{bbox.inspect}."
+ assert_boundary_error map, " The server said: The minimum longitude must be less than the maximum longitude, but it wasn't", bbox.inspect
end
end
# check contents of message
map = amf_result "/1"
assert_equal 0, map[0], 'first map element should be 0'
- assert_equal Array, map[1].class, 'second map element should be an array'
+ assert_equal "", map[1], 'second map element should be an empty string'
+ assert_equal Array, map[2].class, 'third map element should be an array'
# TODO: looks like amf_controller changed since this test was written
# so someone who knows what they're doing should check this!
- assert !map[1].include?(current_ways(:used_way).id),
+ assert !map[2].include?(current_ways(:used_way).id),
"map should not include used way"
- assert map[1].include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id),
+ assert map[2].include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id),
'map should include deleted way'
end
amf_parse_response
map = amf_result "/1"
- assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error."
+ assert_deleted_boundary_error map, " The server said: The maximum bbox size is 0.25, and your request was too large. Either request a smaller area, or use planet.osm"
end
def test_getrelation
post :amf_read
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
- assert_equal amf_result("/1")[0], id
+ rel = amf_result("/1")
+ assert_equal rel[0], 0
+ assert_equal rel[2], id
end
def test_getrelation_invisible
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
rel = amf_result("/1")
- assert_equal rel[0], id
- assert rel[1].empty? and rel[2].empty?
+ assert_equal rel[0], -4
+ assert_equal rel[1], "relation"
+ assert_equal rel[2], id
+ assert rel[3].nil? and rel[4].nil?
end
def test_getrelation_nonexistent
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
rel = amf_result("/1")
- assert_equal rel[0], id
- assert rel[1].empty? and rel[2].empty?
+ assert_equal rel[0], -4
+ assert_equal rel[1], "relation"
+ assert_equal rel[2], id
+ assert rel[3].nil? and rel[4].nil?
end
def test_getway_old
# instead of a version number...
# try to get version 1
v1 = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)
- { latest => '',
- v1 => v1.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")
- }.each do |way, t|
- amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.id, t]
+ { latest.id => '',
+ v1.way_id => v1.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")
+ }.each do |id, t|
+ amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [id, t]
post :amf_read
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
returned_way = amf_result("/1")
- assert_equal way.id, returned_way[1]
+ assert_equal 0, returned_way[0]
+ assert_equal id, returned_way[2]
# API returns the *latest* version, even for old ways...
- assert_equal latest.version, returned_way[4]
+ assert_equal latest.version, returned_way[5]
end
end
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
returned_way = amf_result("/1")
- assert returned_way[2].empty?
- assert returned_way[3].empty?
- assert returned_way[4] < 0
+ assert_equal -1, returned_way[0]
+ assert returned_way[3].nil?
+ assert returned_way[4].nil?
+ assert returned_way[5].nil?
end
end
v1 = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)
# try to get last visible version of non-existent way
# try to get specific version of non-existent way
- [[nil, ''],
- [nil, '1 Jan 1970, 00:00:00'],
- [v1, (v1.timestamp - 10).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")]
- ].each do |way, t|
- amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.nil? ? 0 : way.id, t]
+ [[0, ''],
+ [0, '1 Jan 1970, 00:00:00'],
+ [v1.way_id, (v1.timestamp - 10).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")]
+ ].each do |id, t|
+ amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [id, t]
post :amf_read
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
returned_way = amf_result("/1")
- assert returned_way[2].empty?
- assert returned_way[3].empty?
- assert returned_way[4] < 0
+ assert_equal -1, returned_way[0]
+ assert returned_way[3].nil?
+ assert returned_way[4].nil?
+ assert returned_way[5].nil?
end
end
# ['way',wayid,history]
assert_equal 'way', history[0]
assert_equal latest.id, history[1]
- # for some reason undocumented, the potlatch API now prefers dates
- # over version numbers. presumably no-one edits concurrently any more?
- assert_equal latest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].first[0]
- assert_equal oldest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].last[0]
+ # We use dates rather than version numbers here, because you might
+ # have moved a node within a way (i.e. way version not incremented).
+ # The timestamp is +1 because we say "give me the revision of 15:33:02",
+ # but that might actually include changes at 15:33:02.457.
+ assert_equal (latest.timestamp + 1).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].first[0]
+ assert_equal (oldest.timestamp + 1).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].last[0]
end
def test_getway_history_nonexistent
history = amf_result("/1")
# ['node',nodeid,history]
+ # note that (as per getway_history) we actually round up
+ # to the next second
assert_equal history[0], 'node',
'first element should be "node"'
assert_equal history[1], latest.id,
'second element should be the input node ID'
- # NOTE: changed this test to match what amf_controller actually
- # outputs - which may or may not be what potlatch is expecting.
- # someone who knows potlatch (i.e: richard f) should review this.
- # NOTE2: wow - this is the second time this has changed in the
- # API and the tests are being patched up.
assert_equal history[2].first[0],
- latest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
- 'first part of third element should be the latest version'
+ (latest.timestamp + 1).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
+ 'first element in third element (array) should be the latest version'
assert_equal history[2].last[0],
- nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
- 'second part of third element should be the initial version'
+ (nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).timestamp + 1).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
+ 'last element in third element (array) should be the initial version'
end
def test_getnode_history_nonexistent
# AMF Write tests
def test_putpoi_update_valid
nd = current_nodes(:visible_node)
- amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@openstreetmap.org:test", nd.changeset_id, nd.version, nd.id, nd.lon, nd.lat, nd.tags, nd.visible]
+ cs_id = changesets(:public_user_first_change).id
+ amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", cs_id, nd.version, nd.id, nd.lon, nd.lat, nd.tags, nd.visible]
post :amf_write
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
result = amf_result("/1")
assert_equal 0, result[0]
- assert_equal nd.id, result[1]
+ assert_equal "", result[1]
assert_equal nd.id, result[2]
- assert_equal nd.version+1, result[3]
+ assert_equal nd.id, result[3]
+ assert_equal nd.version+1, result[4]
# Now try to update again, with a different lat/lon, using the updated version number
lat = nd.lat+0.1
lon = nd.lon-0.1
- amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@openstreetmap.org:test", nd.changeset_id, nd.version+1, nd.id, lon, lat, nd.tags, nd.visible]
+ amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@example.com:test", cs_id, nd.version+1, nd.id, lon, lat, nd.tags, nd.visible]
post :amf_write
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
result = amf_result("/2")
assert_equal 0, result[0]
- assert_equal nd.id, result[1]
+ assert_equal "", result[1]
assert_equal nd.id, result[2]
- assert_equal nd.version+2, result[3]
+ assert_equal nd.id, result[3]
+ assert_equal nd.version+2, result[4]
end
# Check that we can create a no valid poi
lat = rand(100)-50 + rand
lon = rand(100)-50 + rand
# normal user has a changeset open
- changeset = changesets(:normal_user_first_change)
+ changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change)
- amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@openstreetmap.org:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, {}, nil]
+ amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, {}, nil]
post :amf_write
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
result = amf_result("/1")
# check the array returned by the amf
- assert_equal 4, result.size
+ assert_equal 5, result.size
assert_equal 0, result[0], "expected to get the status ok from the amf"
- assert_equal 0, result[1], "The old id should be 0"
- assert result[2] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0"
- assert_equal 1, result[3], "The new version should be 1"
+ assert_equal 0, result[2], "The old id should be 0"
+ assert result[3] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0"
+ assert_equal 1, result[4], "The new version should be 1"
# Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly
# in both the current and history tables
# First check the current table
- current_node = Node.find(result[2])
+ current_node = Node.find(result[3].to_i)
assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly"
assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly"
assert_equal 0, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
- assert_equal result[3], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+ assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
# Now check the history table
- historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[2] })
+ historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[3] })
assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created"
first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first
assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly"
assert_in_delta lon, first_historic_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreuved correctly"
assert_equal 0, first_historic_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node"
- assert_equal result[3], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+ assert_equal result[4], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
####
# This node has some tags
lat = rand(100)-50 + rand
lon = rand(100)-50 + rand
# normal user has a changeset open
- changeset = changesets(:normal_user_first_change)
+ changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change)
- amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@openstreetmap.org:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, { "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, nil]
+ amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, { "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, nil]
post :amf_write
assert_response :success
amf_parse_response
result = amf_result("/2")
# check the array returned by the amf
- assert_equal 4, result.size
+ assert_equal 5, result.size
assert_equal 0, result[0], "Expected to get the status ok in the amf"
- assert_equal 0, result[1], "The old id should be 0"
- assert result[2] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0"
- assert_equal 1, result[3], "The new version should be 1"
+ assert_equal 0, result[2], "The old id should be 0"
+ assert result[3] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0"
+ assert_equal 1, result[4], "The new version should be 1"
# Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly
# in both the current and history tables
# First check the current table
- current_node = Node.find(result[2])
+ current_node = Node.find(result[3].to_i)
assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly"
assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly"
assert_equal 2, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, current_node.tags, "tags are different")
- assert_equal result[3], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+ assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
# Now check the history table
- historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[2] })
+ historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[3] })
assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created"
first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first
assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly"
assert_in_delta lon, first_historic_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreuved correctly"
assert_equal 2, first_historic_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node"
assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, first_historic_node.tags, "tags are different")
- assert_equal result[3], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+ assert_equal result[4], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
end
+ # try creating a POI with rubbish in the tags
+ def test_putpoi_create_with_control_chars
+ # This node has no tags
+ nd = Node.new
+ # create a node with random lat/lon
+ lat = rand(100)-50 + rand
+ lon = rand(100)-50 + rand
+ # normal user has a changeset open
+ changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change)
+
+ mostly_invalid = (0..31).to_a.map {|i| i.chr}.join
+ tags = { "something" => "foo#{mostly_invalid}bar" }
+
+ amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, tags, nil]
+ post :amf_write
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ result = amf_result("/1")
+
+ # check the array returned by the amf
+ assert_equal 5, result.size
+ assert_equal 0, result[0], "Expected to get the status ok in the amf"
+ assert_equal 0, result[2], "The old id should be 0"
+ assert result[3] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0"
+ assert_equal 1, result[4], "The new version should be 1"
+
+ # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly
+ # in both the current and history tables
+ # First check the current table
+ current_node = Node.find(result[3].to_i)
+ assert_equal 1, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
+ assert_equal({ "something" => "foo\t\n\rbar" }, current_node.tags, "tags were not fixed correctly")
+ assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+ end
+
+ # try creating a POI with rubbish in the tags
+ def test_putpoi_create_with_invalid_utf8
+ # This node has no tags
+ nd = Node.new
+ # create a node with random lat/lon
+ lat = rand(100)-50 + rand
+ lon = rand(100)-50 + rand
+ # normal user has a changeset open
+ changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change)
+
+ invalid = "\xc0\xc0"
+ tags = { "something" => "foo#{invalid}bar" }
+
+ amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, tags, nil]
+ post :amf_write
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ result = amf_result("/1")
+
+ assert_equal 2, result.size
+ assert_equal -1, result[0], "Expected to get the status FAIL in the amf"
+ assert_equal "One of the tags is invalid. Linux users may need to upgrade to Flash Player 10.1.", result[1]
+ end
+
def test_putpoi_delete_valid
end
end
+ def test_startchangeset_invalid_xmlchar_comment
+ invalid = "\035\022"
+ comment = "foo#{invalid}bar"
+
+ amf_content "startchangeset", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", Hash.new, nil, comment, 1]
+ post :amf_write
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ result = amf_result("/1")
+
+ assert_equal 3, result.size, result.inspect
+ assert_equal 0, result[0]
+ new_cs_id = result[2].to_i
+
+ cs = Changeset.find(new_cs_id)
+ assert_equal "foobar", cs.tags["comment"]
+ end
+
# ************************************************************
# AMF Helper functions
# The result is a hash of message_ref => data.
# The attribute @amf_result is initialised to this hash.
def amf_parse_response
- if @response.body.class.to_s == 'Proc'
- res = StringIO.new()
- @response.body.call @response, res
- req = StringIO.new(res.string)
- else
- req = StringIO.new(@response.body)
- end
+ req = StringIO.new(@response.body)
+
req.read(2) # version
# parse through any headers
yield map, bbox
end
end
+
+ # this should be what AMF controller returns when the bbox of a
+ # whichways request is invalid or too large.
+ def assert_boundary_error(map, msg=nil, error_hint=nil)
+ expected_map = [-2, "Sorry - I can't get the map for that area.#{msg}"]
+ assert_equal expected_map, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error. (#{error_hint})"
+ end
+
+ # this should be what AMF controller returns when the bbox of a
+ # whichways_deleted request is invalid or too large.
+ def assert_deleted_boundary_error(map, msg=nil, error_hint=nil)
+ expected_map = [-2, "Sorry - I can't get the map for that area.#{msg}"]
+ assert_equal expected_map, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error. (#{error_hint})"
+ end
end
projects / rails.git / blobdiff